View from the Vinalhaven ferry on a rainy day, Annie Avilés

At college, most people had little to no experience with rural life—so I came up with an easy shorthand to describe where I’m from in Maine. I’d say we lived in the middle of the woods, far from highways or stores and pretty far from other people. And then, for illustration and dramatic effect, I’d deadpan: “At our house you can yell at the top of your lungs and no one will hear you.”

A little weird yet also true, it communicated that home was a place a lot of people would describe as the middle of nowhere, without actually using that phrase. Plus, it struck what at the time felt like the right balance of quirky and backwoods yet also able to see where I’m from through the eyes of outsiders, all of which seemed key to being perceived as a “good” hick.

One of a handful of other people I met at school with a similar background was my roommate, who came from an even more rural town in Vermont. Getting to her home involved driving through the mountains on miles of dirt roads, then depending on weather, possibly walking or snowshoeing or snowmobiling the final mile. A place that could pass the yelling test with flying colors.

Anyway, we were both from the sticks, while our classmates were mostly raised in cities or suburbs. And when we talked about home, their responses tended to be some version of I couldn’t live like that, or the slightly more generous I’ve been on vacation, it’s beautiful but I can’t imagine living there.

For them, part of it was geographic isolation. But an equal or maybe even bigger issue was the digital isolation. Although we’re millennials, my roommate and I grew up in places with no cable—and where internet service not only arrived far later than in cities and suburbs, but was so slow and expensive and prone to going out for days or weeks at a time that it was more like not having any. So if we technically belonged to the first generation whose childhood and adolescence was as an ever-expanding virtual landscape of information, the reality was that we lived elsewhere, immersed in striking natural landscapes, which provided a different kind of information.

That said, not having internet when most other people do is a problem.

According to Pew, just seven years ago, internet connectivity was still a problem for nearly 60% of rural U.S. households. This improved during the pandemic—however pandemic-era funding that supported rural internet has since been cut. And global internet access remains deeply unequal. In 2024, the U.N. estimated that 52% of people living in rural areas worldwide still aren’t online, compared to just 18% of people living in cities. And now AI is being pushed as essential to the future—yet even if you ignore the host of issues raised by the tech and the way it’s being developed, what does using AI require? Reliable internet.

The impact of what often gets described as an internet gap—as if the internet were a daydreamy child falling behind in class and not a massive network of infrastructure and services run by businesses and governments—is just one of many nuances missing in larger narratives about the future. Especially when it comes to so-called rural people and the places we live.

Even that phrase—rural people, or in the US, rural Americans—obscures more than it reveals. Take Maine as an example, where it means members of the tribes that make up the Wabanaki Confederacy, whose families have been here for 12,000 years, as well as working class people whose families migrated to Maine one or two or half a dozen generations ago. It’s nurses and farmworkers and teachers and artists and business owners, some of whom come from other countries or states. Increasingly, it’s influencers with varying levels of celebrity, many of whom arrived in recent years and do anything from reading tarot or sharing decor and cooking tips, to posting about survivalism. It’s also trust fund kids who have never needed to work and tech workers trying to escape the internet they helped build and other wealthy pandemic-era transplants who maybe even passed as vaguely middle class in cities, all of whom often live more like landed gentry once they go rural.

They live in farmhouses, net zero homes, cabins, condos, compounds, yurts, trailers, in-law units, tents, campers, and cars. The structures sit on tiny lots where you can peer into your neighbor’s windows and two acre parcels with suburban-style lawns and far larger properties that range from cut over brush and muck, to grand lodges and coastal estates passed down over generations. In Maine they are a majority but by no means only white. Some have progressive social values and some are various persuasions of conservative and some vote across party lines. Some don’t vote at all. And this is just one state. Because Maine rural differs from Montana rural differs from Alabama rural and so on.

There are simply too many kinds of people considered rural in a demographic sense to use terms like “rural people” or “rural Americans” and call it good. Especially now.

And while rural places might seem like the opposite of a tech story, what’s happening here is in many ways about technology. While there still isn’t internet everywhere in the U.S., it’s become faster and more accessible in many areas, which influences who now wants to live there. The pandemic of course accelerated that process. Now add to that:

We are so far beyond any semblance of the tidy urban-rural divide people sometimes use to explain the world. Instead, what we have are many different kinds of rural lands and subcultures—and many angles to the story of who is rural and what comes next. The only thing for certain is that big changes are happening and the future of rural places impacts everyone, wherever we live.

All of this is why I’m making The Sticks.

Keep Reading